Are You Over-Paying (or Under-Paying) Consumer-use tax?
Automation and improved control can save your company millions.
January 27, 2011
It's no secret that taxing jurisdictions across the country are suffering from the economic downturn and are anxious to close the tax gap. Before asking their constituents for a tax increase, they're deploying sophisticated auditing techniques like statistical sampling to uncover incorrect calculation of consumer-use tax. This is especially true when the taxpayer has such a volume of records that it's impractical for an auditor to examine every record. Now is a good time to review the processes your company has in place currently to manage consumer-use tax. First, a primer.
Consumer-use Tax: What Is It?
Every state that imposes a sales tax has a mirror-image tax called a use tax. The tax can take two forms: a seller's use tax or a consumer-use tax. The seller's use tax is imposed upon an interstate transaction and is collected from the buyer by the seller. The requirement for a seller to collect use tax depends upon whether or not the seller has nexus in the buyer's state. Nexus is the minimum necessary connection between a business and a jurisdiction in order to trigger the requirement to register and collect tax. If the seller does not have nexus in the buyer's state, the state then requires that the buyer self assess the use tax and remit payment to the state. This is known as consumer-use tax. Most states have a consumer-use tax at the local level as well as the state level, which adds to the complexity of maintaining compliance.
Use Tax Is Often a Second Priority
While most companies have been diligent about calculating, collecting and remitting sales tax, a systematic approach to dealing with consumer-use tax is not as widespread. Most businesses maintain in-house tax expertise or use consulting services to determine the taxability of what they sell. Determining the taxability of what they purchase is typically left to the purchasing or accounting department. This loss of control for the tax department can result in underpayment or overpayment, costing a company millions.
There are a number of contributing factors that can make this approach costly:
Myriad considerations when determining consumer-use taxability include:
In addition, there are specific asset and inventory events that should trigger a closer look at consumer-use tax liability, including:
To further complicate the process, here are two additional scenarios that can affect taxability determination. Both require that a company use an automated system for consumer-use tax.
But without careful management, both scenarios can result in overpayment or underpayment.
Automation Is the Solution
Without a thorough understanding of all the intricacies of consumer-use tax, your company could be overpaying or underpaying. Given the complexities of the tax laws and the multitude of items most companies purchase and use in different ways, the only feasible way to handle the requirements of consumer-use tax is through automation. There are software applications available that provide tax rule support in conjunction with data element mapping and configuration capabilities. These applications can make the proper-use tax determinations by utilizing general ledger account numbers, project numbers, vendor codes or usage codes.
When the time for an audit does come, the fact that your business has a system in place for consumer-use tax will go a long way toward convincing the authorities that your company doesn't have systemic use tax problems. This will make audits go quicker and help prevent examinations from spiraling out of control. This, in turn, will reduce the administrative overhead associated with the use-tax audit and minimize penalties and interest for incorrectly reporting use tax.The bottom line? Automating consumer-use tax can dramatically affect your bottom line.
Rate this article 5 (excellent) to 1 (poor). Send your responses here.
John Minassian is a financial executive with over 30 years of experience in operational, accounting, finance and tax matters. As chief sales and use tax officer, he writes and speaks on today's tax issues and currently leads the tax research function for Vertex Inc. Minassian's work experience includes positions with E. I. DuPont de Nemours, ICI Americas and AMP, Inc. (now Tyco Electronics).