Accelerating Rebate Liability Via Recurring Item Exception
Various sources differ as to whether the economic performance rules are part of the all-events test. Even the IRS seems to treat it in different ways.
by Andrew Gantman/The Tax Adviser
On August 22, 2008, the IRS released Chief Counsel Advice (CCA) 200834019, addressing whether a retailer could use the recurring-item exception of Sec. 461(h)(3) to treat its cash rebate liability as incurred in the year of the sale of the rebate-eligible product.
In a nutshell, the Office of Chief Counsel concluded that the taxpayer may not do so, because the rebate liability was not fixed until the customer complied with the rebate requirements and thus did not meet the required all-events test. As a result, the question of the recurring-item exception’s applicability was moot.
Incidentally, this CCA is apparently related to CCA 200826006, in which the IRS advised that a retailer’s method of accounting for its cash rebate liabilities was not permitted under the regulations. In that case, the taxpayer did not record the full purchase price as income at the time of the sale, even though it received full price at that time. Instead, it reduced its gross receipts by the amount of its estimated rebate payment. Later, if a particular rebate expired, it reversed the prior reduction from gross receipts by bringing back into income the amount of its previously estimated rebate payment. The Service stated that this method did not follow Regs. Sec. 1.461-4(g)(3), which provides that economic performance for rebates occurs as payment is made to the person to whom the liability is owed.
This article has been excerpted from The Tax Adviser. View the full article here (PDF).
Notice to Readers:Members of the AICPA tax section may subscribe to The Tax Adviser at a reduced price. Contact 800-513-3037 or email@example.com for a subscription to the magazine or to become a member of the tax section.