Product Image

Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992)

Publisher: AICPA
Availability: Varies by Format (See Below)
See Below To Add To Cart
View Online Catalog
Add This Page

Description

This landmark report was commissioned by the Committee on Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). It establishes a common definition of internal control that services the needs of different parties for assessing and improving their control systems.

Produced after the release of the Treadway Commission's recommendations, this COSO document provides principles-based guidance for designing and implementing effective internal controls. COSO developed the framework in response to senior executives' need for effective ways to better control their enterprises and to help ensure that organizational objectives related to operations, reporting, and compliance are achieved. This framework has become the most widely used internal control framework in the U.S. and has been adapted or adopted by numerous countries and businesses around the world.

COSO's groundbreaking report includes:

  • Executive Summary
  • Framework
  • Reporting to External Parties
  • Evaluation Tools

The Addendum to Reporting to External Parties is also included.

It encourages management that reports to external parties on controls over financial reporting to also cover controls over safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition.

It defines such controls and provides a suggested form of report.

Five Evaluation Tools are now available on disk, one for each of the internal control components identified in Integrated Framework for Internal Control. Columnar MS Word templates contain internal control risks, objectives, components and elements with spaces and columns for management or other evaluators to record their assessments, observations and conclusions.

Everyone in your firm or company who works with internal controls should have his or her own copy.

Note: The PDF edition is an electronic download file that will be accessible immediately after completing your purchase. Access to this file – from the My Account > My Downloads page – expires 90 days from purchase date. This product purchase is non-refundable. For more information about this product or service concerns, please contact the AICPA Service Center at service@aicpa.org or call 888-777-7077.

NOTE:  Participating members of the COSO organizations are eligible to receive copies of this framework document at the AICPA member price shown. If you are a member of any one of the organizations listed below, please enter your appropriate Coupon Code in the Coupon Discount Code box during checkout.

Organization

Coupon Code

American Accounting Association AAAIC
Financial Executives International FEIIC
Institute of Internal Auditors IIAIC
Institute of Management Accountants     IMAIC

Other COSO documents:
Enterprise Risk Management—Integrated Framework (2004)
Internal Control over Financial Reporting—Guidance for Smaller Public Companies (2006)
Guidance on Monitoring Internal Control Systems (2009)

Table of Contents

Excerpts

Executive Summary

Senior executives have long sought ways to better control the enterprises they run. Internal controls are put in place to keep the company on course toward profitability goals and achievement of its mission, and to minimize surprises along the way. They enable management to deal with rapidly changing economic and competitive environments, shifting customer demands and priorities, and restructuring for future growth. Internal controls promote efficiency, reduce risk of asset loss, and help ensure the reliability of financial statements and compliance with laws and regulations.

Because internal control serves many important purposes, there are increasing calls for better internal control systems and report cards on them. Internal control is looked upon more and more as a solution to a variety of potential problems.

What Internal Control Is

Internal control means different things to different people. This causes confusion among businesspeople, legislators, regulators and others. Resulting miscommunication and different expectations cause problems within an enterprise. Problems are compounded when the term, if not clearly defined, is written into law, regulation or rule.

This report deals with the needs and expectations of management and others. It defines and describes internal control to:

• Establish a common definition serving the needs of different parties.

• Provide a standard against which business and other entities — large or small, in the public or private sector, for profit or not — can assess their control systems and determine how to improve them.

Internal control is broadly defined as a process, effected by an entity’s board of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories:

• Effectiveness and efficiency of operations.
• Reliability of financial reporting.
• Compliance with applicable laws and regulations.

The first category addresses an entity’s basic business objectives, including performance and profitability goals and safeguarding of resources. The second relates to the preparation of reliable published financial statements, including interim and condensed financial statements and selected financial data derived from such statements, such as earnings releases, reported publicly. The third deals with complying with those laws and regulations to which the entity is subject. These distinct but overlapping categories address different needs and allow a directed focus to meet the separate needs.

Internal control systems operate at different levels of effectiveness. Internal control can be judged effective in each of the three categories, respectively, if the board of directors and management have reasonable assurance that:

• They understand the extent to which the entity’s operations objectives are being achieved.
• Published financial statements are being prepared reliably.
• Applicable laws and regulations are being complied with.

While internal control is a process, its effectiveness is a state or condition of the process at one or more points in time.

Internal control consists of five interrelated components. These are derived from the way management runs a business, and are integrated with the management process. Although the components apply to all entities, small and mid-size companies may implement them differently than large ones. Its controls may be less formal and less structured, yet a small company can still have effective internal control. The components are:

• Control Environment — The control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people. It is the foundation for all other components of internal control, providing discipline and structure. Control environment factors include the integrity, ethical values and competence of the entity’s people; management’s philosophy and operating style; the way management assigns authority and responsibility, and organizes and develops its people; and the attention and direction provided by the board of directors.

• Risk Assessment — Every entity faces a variety of risks from external and internal sources that must be assessed. A precondition to risk assessment is establishment of objectives, linked at different levels and internally consistent. Risk assessment is the identification and analysis of relevant risks to achievement of the objectives, forming a basis for determining how the risks should be managed. Because economic, industry, regulatory and operating conditions will continue to change, mechanisms are needed to identify and deal with the special risks associated with change.

• Control Activities — Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure management directives are carried out. They help ensure that necessary actions are taken to address risks to achievement of the entity’s objectives. Control activities occur throughout the organization, at all levels and in all functions. They include a range of activities as diverse as approvals, authorizations, verifications, reconciliations, reviews of operating performance, security of assets and segregation of duties.

• Information and Communication — Pertinent information must be identified, captured and communicated in a form and timeframe that enable people to carry out their responsibilities. Information systems produce reports, containing operational, financial and compliance-related information, that make it possible to run and control the business.

They deal not only with internally generated data, but also information about external events, activities and conditions necessary to informed business decision-making and external reporting. Effective communication also must occur in a broader sense, flowing down, across and up the organization. All personnel must receive a clear message from top management that control responsibilities must be taken seriously. They must understand their own role in the internal control system, as well as how individual activities relate to the work of others. They must have a means of communicating significant information upstream. There also needs to be effective communication with external parties, such as customers, suppliers, regulators and shareholders.

• Monitoring — Internal control systems need to be monitored–a process that assesses the quality of the system’s performance over time. This is accomplished through ongoing monitoring activities, separate evaluations or a combination of the two. Ongoing monitoring occurs in the course of operations. It includes regular management and supervisory activities, and other actions personnel take in performing their duties. The scope and frequency of separate evaluations will depend primarily on an assessment of risks and the effectiveness of ongoing monitoring procedures. Internal control deficiencies should be reported upstream, with serious matters reported to top management and the board.

There is synergy and linkage among these components, forming an integrated system that reacts dynamically to changing conditions. The internal control system is intertwined with the entity’s operating activities and exists for fundamental business reasons. Internal control is most effective when controls are built into the entity’s infrastructure and are a part of the essence of the enterprise. “Built in” controls support quality and empowerment initiatives, avoid unnecessary costs and enable quick response to changing conditions.

There is a direct relationship between the three categories of objectives, which are what an entity strives to achieve, and components, which represent what is needed to achieve the objectives. All components are relevant to each objectives category. When looking at any one category — the effectiveness and efficiency of operations, for instance — all five components must be present and functioning effectively to conclude that internal control over operations is effective.

The internal control definition — with its underlying fundamental concepts of a process, effected by people, providing reasonable assurance — together with the categorization of objectives and the components and criteria for effectiveness, and the associated discussions, constitute this internal control framework.

Copyright © 1985-2006 The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. All rights reserved.

To see the entire Executive Summary, Click Here.

Subscription Info

Paperback , 1992
Product# 990012
Availability:In Stock
Regular:$35.00
AICPA Member:$28.00
Your Price:$35.00
Publication On-Demand 1992
Product# 990012PDF
Availability:Online Access
Regular:$35.00
AICPA Member:$28.00
Your Price:$35.00
To receive your AICPA member discount, Sign In now, or Register using your AICPA membership number.
Choose the Standing Order Option and get these discounts on your initial purchase:

Publications--10% discount
CPE Self-Study--20% discount

Each new future annual edition will then be automatically shipped to you at a 10% discount.