Product Image

Studies On Single Audit And Yellow Book Deficiencies

Author/Moderator: William C. Wagner, CPA and Daniel W. Bradley, CPA
Publisher: AICPA
Availability: In Stock
See Below To Add To Cart
View Online Catalog
Add This Page

Description

The best way to avoid Single Audit and Yellow Book engagement deficiencies is to recognize them! Learn how to avoid some of the common pitfalls miring these engagements. This course takes on serious issues in an exciting case study format, and provides an informative look at avoiding some of the more common problems found in Yellow Book and A-133 engagements. The 2009 version of the course also reviews developments related to the A-133 audit process as a result of the recent federal study on audit quality.

Objectives:

  • Apply key concepts in Yellow Book and A-133 audits
  • Learn from the mistakes of others
  • Utilize common sense solutions to common problems noted in Yellow Book and A-133 engagements

Prerequisite: Experience in the Yellow Book and A-133 environment

Table of Contents

  • Chapter 0 - A Roadmap for Today’s Course and Environment
    • The 2007 Report on National Single Audit Sampling Project
      • Misreporting of Audit Coverage of Major Federal Programs
      • Unreported Audit Findings
      • Compliance Testing Not Documented as Performed or Not Applicable
      • Deficiencies in Understanding\Testing Compliance Internal Controls
      • Deficiencies in Risk Assessments as Part of Major Program Determination
      • Missing Audit Finding Information
      • Deficiencies in Presentation and Auditing of the SEFA
      • Errors in Management Representations Related to Federal Awards
      • Audit Materiality at the Major Federal Program Level Not Documented
      • Other Kinds of Deficiencies
      • A Discussion Related to Audit Sampling
      • Proposed Recommendations to Improve Audit Quality
      • Developments Since the 2007 Report
      • How the Report Relates to this Course
    • Additional Items to Watch For
      • The 2009 OMB A-133 Compliance Supplement
      • Guidance Related to SAS No. 115
      • Submissions of the 2008-2010 Data Collection Form (DCF)
      • SAS No. 74 Revision
  • Chapter 1 - Case 1 – Engagement Letters
    • Learning Objective
    • What are Engagement Letters and Why Do We Have Them?
    • What Should Engagement Letters Cover?
    • Common Engagement Letter Deficiencies
    • Exercise
  • Chapter 2 - Case 2 – Yellow Book CPE
    • Learning Objective
    • Two Important Items
    • Exercise
    • On the Horizon
  • Chapter 3 - Case 3 – The Day the Yellow Book Came to the Farm
    • Learning Objective
    • Background
    • Exercise
    • Exercise
    • Exercise
    • Conclusion
  • Chapter 4 - Case 4 – Single Audit versus Program-Specific Audit
    • Learning Objective
    • A Surprise
    • Exercise
  • Chapter 5 - Case 5 – A-133 Major Program Determination
    • Learning Objective
    • A Risk-Based Approach
    • Exercise Year 20X1
  • Chapter 6 - Case 6 – Allowable Costs
    • Learning Objective
    • Too High of a Cost?
    • Exercise
  • Chapter 7 - Case 7 – Abuse
    • Learning Objective
    • What Are the Yellow Book Requirements Related To Abuse?
    • Is There a Way to Summarize This?
    • Exercise
  • Chapter 8 - Case 8 – Fraud Risk Factors
    • Learning Objective
    • Background
    • Exercise
  • Chapter 9 - Case 9 – Audit Sampling
    • Learning Objective
    • Background
    • Exercise
  • Chapter 10 - Case 10 – Documentation Dilemmas
    • Learning Objective
    • Background
    • Common Documentation Deficiencies Noted in A-133 Audits
    • Additional Documentation Deficiencies
    • Exercise
  • Chapter 11 - Case 11 – Representation Letters
    • Learning Objective
    • What Are Management Representation Letters and Why Do We Have Them?
    • What Should Representation Letters Cover?
    • Common Management Representation Letter Deficiencies
    • Exercise
  • Chapter 12 - Case 12 – Yellow Book Reporting Issues
    • Learning Objective
    • Different Levels of Reporting for Different Types of Engagements
    • Part 1 – Quakertown Children Services and PMM CPAs
    • Part 2 – Independence Revisited
  • Chapter 13 - Case 13 – Drafting Findings
    • Learning Objective
    • Background
    • WIC Services Inc. and PMM, CPAs
  • Chapter 14 - Case 14 – Deficiencies, Deficiencies
    • Learning Objectives
    • Background on SAS No. 115
    • Exercise
  • Chapter 15 - Case 15 – SEFA Quandaries
    • Learning Objectives
    • Background
    • Exercise
  • Chapter 16 - Latest Developments
  • Appendix A
  • Appendix B
  • Appendix C
  • Appendix D
  • Appendix E
  • Appendix F
  • Appendix G

733033

Excerpts

Chapter 4 - Case 4 – Single Audit versus Program-Specific Audit

Learning Objective
• Examine issues regarding the determination of whether a single audit or program-specific audit is appropriate.
A Surprise

The Raiders of the Lost Art, a small non-profit located near Niles, Ohio, is devoted to rescuing stolen artwork and returning these treasures back to their rightful owners. Sam Pharaoh has been the Treasurer of the Board and historically prepared the organization’s IRS Form 990 without any major difficulties.

But, once upon a time, Sam received a notice from the Institute for Museum Services asking for a copy of their single audit for 20X1. Sam responded that the Raiders of the Lost Art had never had one single audit conducted and the Board, as a whole, felt that the need for even one single audit was not necessary. Sam also thanked the Institute for Museum Services for their concern; however, the Board was very capable of managing their own affairs and did not need interference from the federal government.

A few weeks later, Mia, the receptionist of the Raiders of the Lost Art, received a phone call from Lars Brother from the Institute for Museum Services. Lars indicated that they were in receipt of a letter signed by Mr. Pharaoh, in which Mr. Pharaoh indicated that a single audit was not conducted. Lars went on to explain to Mia that, since the Institute for Museum Services had provided the Raiders of the Lost Art with a $600,000 federal grant which was fully expended in 20X1, OMB Circular A-133 was applicable and, as a result, an audit would be required.

Mia, relayed the following message to Stephanie Spielberg, Executive Director. “Someone, I think it was your brother, called from the Institution of Foreign Services – I think they do maintenance – and said that the Circular was being applied to the Omni and that you are being audited.”

After taking a few (okay, several) aspirins, Stephanie, returned the phone call to Lars (unbelievably Mia actually got the phone number correct) who again explained the requirements.

Stephanie decided to contact Sam and suggest that they get Garrison Chevy’s input. Garrison is a local CPA with extensive auditing experience.

At first Sam resisted, indicating that all CPAs charge exorbitant rates for doing very little. Sam also indicated that the money could be better spent on salary – after all, his daughter Mia (that’s right, Mia Pharaoh), had not received an increase in over four months.

After some arm twisting (literally), Sam agreed to have Stephanie contact Garrison. Garrison was asked to provide the Board with some information regarding OMB Circular A-133.

Garrison attended the next meeting of the full Board of the Raiders of the Lost Art and explained in laymen’s terms (it is possible) the requirements of OMB Circular A-133 and the Single Audit Act Amendment of 1996. Garrison explained that the audit would be an organization-wide audit and that internal controls and compliance with applicable laws and regulations would have to be applied.

Georgia Lucas, Board President, raised some concerns regarding the fact that the organization had never established controls over many areas of their operations due to the lack of people and funds.

Garrison, who was unfamiliar with many details of the organization’s operations asked to see the results of their prior audits.

Sam explained that in their entire existence they had never had a single audit conducted.

Garrison asked whether a Yellow Book audit had been conducted.

Sam again explained, louder this time, that they had never had a single audit conducted.

Garrison again asked, whether a Yellow Book audit or a GAAS audit (not a Single Audit) had ever been conducted.

Sam explained, slowly this time, that no single audit had ever been conducted in a yellow book, a blue book, a pink book, a red book, or a black book – none were conducted. Sam, exasperated now, explained that the non-profit owned no vehicles so no one ever saw a need to audit gas purchases; however, now that Garrison brought it up, he was a little concerned about some of Stephanie’s mileage reimbursements.

At this point, Garrison realized that no single audit, let alone a Single Audit, had ever been conducted.

As a result, Garrison asked about where the Organization’s revenues came from in 20X1.

Stephanie explained that Raiders of the Lost Art depends upon contributions and fundraisers for much of their support; however, during 20X1, she had pulled some strings with some politicians to see if any grant moneys were available. One of these politicians was able to secure a one-time grant from the Institute for Museum Services for $600,000.

Garrison finished by saying that a program-specific audit might be a viable alternative to the organization-wide single audit for the Raiders of the Lost Art. Garrison admitted that, while he conducted many single audits, he had never conducted a program-specific audit for a federal award.

Garrison informed the Board that he would investigate the requirements for a program-specific audit and get back to them regarding his recommendations for how they should proceed.

733033

Videocourse Details

NASBA Field of Study: Auditing (Governmental)
Level: Intermediate
Recommended CPE Credit: 11
Yellow Book Hours: 11
Text
Product# 733033
Availability:In Stock
Regular:$186.25
AICPA Member:$149.00
Your Price:$186.25
To receive your AICPA member discount, Sign In now, or Register using your AICPA membership number.
Choose the Standing Order Option and get these discounts on your initial purchase:

Publications--10% discount
CPE Self-Study--20% discount

Each new future annual edition will then be automatically shipped to you at a 10% discount.