Consolidation Purpose and Policy
As the FASB has stated,
The purpose of consolidated financial statements is to present, primarily for the benefit of the
shareholders and creditors of the parent company, the results of operations and the financial
position of a parent company and its subsidiaries essentially as if the group were a single
entity with one or more branches or divisions. There is a presumption that consolidated
financial statements are more meaningful than separate financial statements and that they are
usually necessary for a fair presentation when one of the entities in the group directly or
indirectly has a controlling financial interest in the other entities. If an entity has one or more
subsidiaries, consolidated financial statements rather than parent-company-only financial
statements are the appropriate general-purpose financial statements.
Omission of relevant information about an entity’s assets, whether controlled directly or
indirectly, and its liabilities, revenues, expenses, gains, and losses impairs the relevance of its
financial statements.
The issue that makes the process of preparing consolidating financial statements more complex
than simply adding balances together is how to deal with investments and transactions between
the companies within the consolidated group. This process is explored in detail in Chapter 4,
“Consolidated Financial Statements.” In the example above, the column labeled eliminations is
used to remove the impact of transactions between members of the group and make the
consolidated statements appear as if only one set of accounting records exists for the
consolidated group.
Limitations also exist within these consolidated statements, and are explored later. These
limitations make the decision about when to require consolidated financial statements more
complex than this simple example.
Current U.S. GAAP Requirements for Consolidation and Business
Combinations
FASB ASC 810,
Consolidation (ARB 51, SFAS No. 94 and SFAS No. 160), is the source of
current U.S. GAAP requirements for consolidation and states that
The usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting
interest, and, therefore, as a general rule, ownership by one entity, directly or indirectly, of
more than 50% of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing
toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of
ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court
decree.
Exceptions
There are certain exceptions to this general rule. A majority-owned subsidiary shall not be
consolidated if control does not rest with the majority owner, for example, if any of the following
are present:
• The entity is in legal reorganization.
• The entity is in bankruptcy.
• The entity operates under foreign exchange restrictions, controls, or other governmentally
imposed uncertainties so severe that they cast significant doubt on the parent's ability to
control the entity.
• Approval or veto rights granted to minority shareholders (minority rights) are so
restrictive as to call into question whether control rests with the majority owner.
• Control exists through means other than ownership of a majority voting interest.
Difference in Fiscal Periods
A difference in fiscal periods of a parent and subsidiary does not justify the exclusion of the
subsidiary from consolidation. It ordinarily is feasible for the subsidiary to prepare, for
consolidation purposes, financial statements for a period that corresponds with or closely
approaches the fiscal period of the parent. However, if the difference is not more than about three
months, it usually is acceptable to use, for consolidation purposes, the subsidiary’s financial
statements for its fiscal period; when this is done, recognition should be given by disclosure or
otherwise to the effect of intervening events that materially affect the financial position or results
of operations.
Policy Disclosure
Consolidated financial statements shall disclose the consolidation policy that is being followed.
In most cases this can be made apparent by the headings or other information in the financial
statements, but in other cases a footnote is required.
Business Combinations and Noncontrolling Interests
In June 2005, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) issued joint
proposals to improve and converge the accounting for business combinations and reporting of
noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. The result of this joint effort on the
U.S. side was the issuance of FASB ASC 805,
Business Combinations [SFAS No. 141(R)], and
FASB ASC 810,
Consolidation (SFAS No. 160).
FASB ASC 805, Business Combinations [SFAS No. 141(R)] and FASB
ASC 810, Consolidation (SFAS No. 160)
On December 4, 2007, the FASB issued FASB ASC 805,
Business Combinations [SFAS No.
141(R)], and FASB ASC 810,
Consolidation (SFAS No.160). Effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008, the objectives of these standards are to improve, simplify,
and converge internationally the accounting for business combinations and the reporting of
noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements.
FASB ASC 805 [SFAS No. 141(R)] and FASB ASC 810 (SFAS No.160) require most
identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and goodwill acquired in a business
combination to be recorded at “full fair value.” The standards also require noncontrolling
interests (previously referred to as minority interests) to be reported as a component of equity,
which changed the accounting for transactions with noncontrolling interest holders.
While certain aspects of the accounting for business combinations and consolidations were made
simpler, FASB ASC 805 [SFAS No. 141(R)] and FASB ASC 810 (SFAS No.160) introduced
new accounting concepts and created certain accounting complexities. Further, the expanded use
of fair value accounting inherently created valuation complexities.
Here are just some of the key changes brought about by FASB ASC 805 [SFAS No. 141(R)] and
FASB ASC 810 (SFAS No.160):
• Transaction costs and restructuring charges are expensed with one exception. The costs to
issue debt or equity securities shall be recognized in accordance with other applicable
U.S. GAAP.
• The accounting for certain assets acquired and liabilities assumed in an acquisition
changed significantly. Some notable examples are that acquired in-process research and
development (IPR&D) assets are capitalized; certain contingent assets and liabilities are
recognized at fair value; and allowances for loan losses on the acquisition date were
eliminated.
• Contingent consideration arrangements, depending on how they are structured, are
measured at fair value until settled, with changes in fair value recognized each period in
earnings.
• In partial acquisitions, when control is obtained, the acquiring company recognizes and
measures at fair value 100% of the assets and liabilities, including goodwill, as if the
entire target company had been acquired.
• Companies do not recognize gains or losses on the sale of shares of a subsidiary when
control is retained.
• Material adjustments made during the measurement period to the initial acquisition
accounting are recorded back to the acquisition date.
Business Combinations
FASB ASC 805,
Business Combinations [SFAS No. 141(R)], applies to all business
combinations; FASB ASC 810,
Consolidation (SFAS No.160), applies to the accounting for
noncontrolling interests and transactions with noncontrolling interest holders in consolidated
financial statements. The FASB ASC glossary defines a business combination as a transaction or
other event in which an acquirer obtains control of one or more businesses. Transactions
sometimes referred to as true mergers or mergers of equals also are business combinations.
The FASB ASC glossary defines a
business as an integrated set of activities and assets that is
capable of being conducted and managed for the purpose of providing a return in the form of
dividends, lower costs, or other economic benefits directly to investors or other owners,
members, or participants. Thus a set of activities and assets may be considered a business even
if it cannot currently access customers or is an “early-stage development entity.”
FASB ASC 805 [SFAS No. 141(R)] also applies to combinations among mutual entities, but like
the previous SFAS No. 141, it does not apply to formations of joint ventures, acquisitions of
assets or groups of assets that do not constitute a business, combinations among entities under
common control, and combinations between not-for-profit organizations or the acquisition of a
for-profit business by a not-for-profit organization.
FASB ASC 805 [SFAS No. 141(R)] requires that all business combinations be accounted for by
applying the acquisition method. Applying the acquisition method requires
• Identifying the acquirer;
• Determining the acquisition date and purchase price;
• Recognizing at their acquisition-date fair values the identifiable assets acquired, liabilities
assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree (with certain exceptions
discussed below); and
• Recognizing goodwill or, in the case of a bargain purchase, a gain.
735162