This essential reference for auditors of non-public companies is fully updated as of January 2009 and will help you find the exact information you need.
All Statements on Auditing Standards (SASs), Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAEs), and related interpretations are organized by subject and indexed in this handy guide. All amendments have been incorporated so you will have the most up-to-date information available.
This edition has been updated to include:
Includes all amendments and conforming changes.
057214
This volume, issued by the Auditing Standards Board (ASB), is a odification of currently effective Statements on Auditing Standards (SASs) and the related auditing interpretations applicable to the preparation and issuance of audit reports for all nonissuers (nonissuers are all entities other than issuers as defined by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or other entities who are required to be audited by a registered public accounting firm as prescribed by the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission). This volume is also a Codification of currently effective Statements on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAEs), and the related attestation interpretations. Superseded portions have been deleted, and all applicable amendments have been included.
SASs are issued by the ASB, the senior technical body of the AICPA designated to issue pronouncements on auditing matters applicable to the preparation and issuance of audit reports for entities that are nonissuers. Rule 202, Compliance With Standards, of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, requires an AICPA member who performs an audit (the auditor) of the financial statements of a nonissuer to comply with standards promulgated by the ASB. An auditor is required to comply with an unconditional requirement in all cases in which the circumstances exist to which the unconditional requirement applies. An auditor is also required to comply with a presumptively mandatory requirement in all cases in which the circumstances exist to which the presumptively mandatory requirement applies; however, in rare circumstances, an auditor may depart from a presumptively mandatory requirement provided the auditor documents his or her justification for the departure and how the alternative procedures performed in the circumstances were sufficient to achieve the objectives of the presumptively mandatory requirement.
Auditing interpretations of SASs are interpretive publications pursuant to AU section 150, Generally Accepted Auditing Standards (AICPA, Professional Standards, vol. 1). Interpretive publications are recommendations on the application of SASs in specific circumstances, including engagements for entities in specialized industries. Interpretive publications are issued under the authority of the ASB. An auditor should be aware of and consider interpretations applicable to his or her audit. An interpretation is not as authoritative as a pronouncement of the ASB; however, if an auditor does not apply an auditing interpretation, the auditor should be prepared to explain how he or she complied with the SAS provisions addressed by such auditing guidance. The specific terms used to define professional requirements in the SASs are not intended to apply to interpretations because interpretations are not auditing standards. It is the ASB's intention to make conforming changes to the interpretations over the next several years to remove any language that would imply a professional requirement where none exists.
SSAEs are issued by senior technical bodies of the AICPA designated to issue pronouncements on attestation matters. Rule 202 of the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct requires an AICPA member who performs an attest engagement (a practitioner) to comply with such pronouncements. A practitioner is required to comply with an unconditional requirement in all cases in which the circumstances exist to which the unconditional requirement applies. A practitioner is also required to comply with a presumptively mandatory requirement in all cases in which the circumstances exist to which the presumptively mandatory requirement applies; however, in rare circumstances, a practitioner may depart from a presumptively mandatory requirement provided that the practitioner documents his or her justification for the departure and how the alternative procedures performed in the circumstances were sufficient to achieve the objectives of the presumptively mandatory requirement.
Attestation interpretations are recommendations on the application of SSAEs in specific circumstances, including engagements for entities in specialized industries, issued under the authority of AICPA senior technical bodies. An interpretation is not as authoritative as a pronouncement of the ASB; however, if a practitioner does not apply an attestation interpretation, the practitioner should be prepared to explain how he or she complied with the SSAE provisions addressed by such attestation guidance. The specific terms used to define professional requirements in the SSAEs are not intended to apply to interpretations because interpretations are not attestation standards. It is the ASB's intention to make conforming changes to the interpretations over the next several years to remove any language that would imply a professional requirement where none exists.
The Accounting and Review Services Committee, ASB, and Consulting Services Executive Committee are the senior technical committees of the AICPA designated to issue enforceable standards under Rules 201 and 202 of the AICPA's Code of Professional Conduct concerning attest services in their respective areas of responsibility.
AUDITING STANDARDS BOARD
Harold L. Monk, Jr., Chairman
Charles E. Landes, Vice President—
Professional Standards and Services
057214
